Gaining on them

September 25, 2009

The track performances don't lie: Newman/Haas/Lanigan Racing is getting a lot closer to the front, as you saw at Motegi. We're not right there yet, as you saw in Chicago.

When I was trying to make the pass for the lead, you could see we're still lacking that last little bit of speed, but our rate of progress from joining the IndyCar Series in 2008 to here, in September '09, is excellent. We're still not Ganassi, we're still not Penske, but we're edging up, no question.

At Chicago, OK, we only left with fifth place, but I was happy we were in the mix. I was a little unsure of what lap we were on toward the end. When my spotter, Lee, is speaking to me a lot because the racetrack is so busy, I don't have time to look up at the scoring pylon, and I'm sure that's true of everyone apart from the leader. For Motegi, we improvised and put a lap charter on the steering wheel, so every time we went past the beacon, it would add a lap. Pretty simple stuff to do, but useful: If I had known what lap we were on at Chicago, maybe I wouldn't have made my move so early. I'd have waited a little bit longer and might have got third: it wouldn't have won us the race, though.

But I can't be disappointed: the No. 02 McDonalds car has made a hell of a run here at the end of the season. There's still work to do, but we're not far off. We made a lot of gains from Kentucky onward, really figuring out the oval car. We still need to work on our road courses, obviously, but not the car: just our luck! We've qualified well all year, but we can't get a good finish, and it's just been a case of errors. The Mid-Ohio race was my fault – I had too much rear brake-bias, locked the rears, and went shooting off the course. At Infineon…I can't say too much about it. The driveshaft would have broken later in the race, anyway, so that's just bad luck. We only ran 20 laps there once it was sorted, and we ended up (I think) with second-fastest race lap.

We've just got to get luckier. Put Watkins Glen aside, because we really qualified fifth there and got penalized because the car was too light, and no one's going to tell me two pounds would have put us down in 15th! So our worst qualifying on a road course was seventh at Long Beach; our worst qualifying anywhere was 12th at Texas because…well, just because we were horrible! So I think we've got to be pretty happy. Ignore Texas and Iowa and we've been close everywhere, and I haven't been at a circuit this year thinking, “We've got no chance this weekend,” and I think everyone on the team is excited by that.

No, Newman/Haas/Lanigan is not getting wins yet at the rate we were in the last few years of Champ Car, but everyone feels the momentum picking up again and I don't think there's anyone on the team that feels down. I think everyone feels a lot of victories to come for this group. I don't want to say I was part of a year when the team didn't get a win – and there is one race left – but truthfully I just say, “Hey, we all tried our hardest, some of us made mistakes, myself included.” We all are keeping our heads down, focused on the last race of the year, and then hopefully all the contract stuff will get sorted and we can continue this through many years to come.

You can see it from the results that Oriol Servia's arrival – or return, I guess – to Newman/Haas/Lanigan Racing has made us a better team. We were very much a one-car team until these last few races. The No. 06 car has had its best results in the last four weekends and Oriol is a guy who, with all his experience, is just so valuable. It's a shame he can't find a ride that's stable. He brings so much to a team because of his knowledge and the guy has an engineering degree – he's just smart. So he was good for us – he helped us out and he's fun. There are a lot more smiles on a lot of people's faces, and it's just a whole different deal than before. We had a good clean battle in Motegi. Actually, at one point I did give him the cold shoulder, but at the same time, I was thinking, “I've really got to get maximum points here, because I have to catch Marco and Danica in the championship.” Ultimately, I thought we had more speed anyway.

For the final race, though, Oriol's being replaced by Alex Lloyd, so that will be interesting. I'd like to have been able to attend Alex's first test: I'll be in Orlando, actually, when my new teammate is testing at Homestead, so it should have been feasible, but I have IndyCar Series promotional duty down there, with sponsors and potential sponsors. I am a firm believer – I'm not just saying this – that there are a lot of positives for the series at the moment. Just look at the racing lately – I thought the last race at Motegi produced the best racing we've had at that circuit. So hopefully we can capitalize on that with increased sponsorship.

A lot of people were worried by the racing in Chicago, a lot of others thought it was just a fantastic spectacle. I fall right in the middle! The racing needs to be that way for the fans, but as I said to someone, “That's OK, let's have it that way…but let's not have it getting any more exciting, or someone's going to end up in pain.” I've got to confess, I was more nervous before that race than any other race in my career. After practice the night before, with as much passing as was going on, and three-wide, I just thought, “This is going to get insane.” Once I got out there, there were still times when I thought it was a little much, but it was fun.

The thing is, if you race up front with the guys that are good, it's not a problem; they give you room. Hopefully, we're going to continue racing at the front, so no problem!

-Graham
 

Graham's column: Back to proper oval racing

Graham Rahal August 13, 2009

So, that was a proper oval race in Kentucky, wasn't it?! I'm finding it pretty hard to wipe the smile off my face a couple of days later. And that's also because we had a strong car, and I think I drove well, too. I don't know which of the aero changes made the difference, but the cars are massively easier to run side-by-side now. It feels like a whole different ballgame. 

We aren't comparing apples with apples though. Everyone was naysaying Richmond this year but, let's be honest, that track was never a great one for racing; and by the same token, last year's Kentucky race was OK anyway. But there's no question these aero changes have improved the racing, and I reckon Chicagoland will be even better. Last year, I spent a good 30 laps or so running three wide, which you never like: It makes you uneasy. I was the cream in the Oreo for a while, and then I was on the high side too, which is always the worst. But the upside of being up top is that if you're gonna crash, you don't have far to go.

Our new power boost button is a help too. Normally we have a 10,300rpm rev limit, and the power boost allows you to go to 10,500, with 20 shots of 12sec each. So let's say I'm running in fifth gear, and in the tow. Well normally I'd be hitting the rev-limiter a little bit, but it also pulls me out of the corners better than sixth gear, obviously. So when I push the button, not only does it give me 5hp through the whole rev range, it allows me to rev to 10,500 and I'm never going to hit the limiter. So it can give you an extra 1.5 to 2mph on the back straight without changing to sixth and letting the revs die away. You have to come off the gas quite a long way to disengage it. We're still not at Champ Car power, and it's not the boost that we had in Champ Car, either, but it's still good and useful.

 In Toronto, the car felt pretty good. We struggled initially and then it got more and more competitive.  And then in the race, I made a dumb move: I expected Ed Carpenter to have seen me, I dove underneath him when he let Danica by, and that took us out of a good weekend, unfortunately. We were going to get a lot of good points, and instead we ended up missing out. I look back and I think how stupid I was, because if we'd got a decent result there and at Watkins Glen, I'd have been in the Top 10.

Toronto was disappointing already, though, because I was tucked up behind Dario, I'd had a good start, it was supposed to be a two-by-two start, and Will Power came across and busted my front wing. No hard feelings, though: Will said it was his fault. It was just bad luck for us, and to be honest, that's how our year has gone. We've had a lot of very good performances, a lot of bad luck and some mistakes on my part: and others that were a mix of all three.

I was pleased with my performance in qualifying, at least. I thought I was going to get pole which, considering how bad we were last time I was there, in 2007, is a major turnaround. It was an example of the team doing a great job to correct difficulties. I think we are showing we have the qualifying pace, there's no doubt about that, and we'd like to think we can get another couple of poles before the year's over. At the end of last year, we sat down together and said, “OK, if we're not in the Firestone Fast Six on at least three occasions, we're going to be disappointed.” And we've been in the Fast Six in every road and street course but one – Long Beach – and there we were seventh. So I'd say we've been pretty good.

I think part of the reason for this improvement is my own performance. I feel much more confident about putting a lap in. When I joined the team two and a half years ago, I told them that I always felt my weak point was qualifying, and if you ever looked at my past career, I always raced well but couldn't get everything out of myself in qualifying. Well this year, I've improved on that massively, and that makes me feel good, because I feel that's not a weak link any more.

Now, don't get me wrong, I realize there's a lot of improving to be done and a lot of learning to be done, but I feel a lot more confident and comfortable. And that also comes from getting a better car, and from being partnered with Justin Wilson last year. He helped me a lot, because although our cars weren't as good as they are this year, he could really carry a car, and that's what I learned from him. So this year, I think there have been times when we've gotten a little bit more out of the car than it really had, but at least we are showing as a team that we can compete. That's the main goal.

Edmonton was a bit more of a struggle, though again we got in the Fast Six in qualifying. But once Paul Tracy was past, we couldn't retaliate right away. There wasn't a whole lot we could do. I was saving more fuel than him – I think on the first stint, we went two laps longer – so we could have got him there, but I think my in-lap wasn't quick enough. Then we ran a second set of reds, which was probably a mistake: when everyone else went red-black-red, we went red-red-black.  Our thinking was that the last stint would be a long one, and we were fearing the reds would fall off, but actually the car's handling was comfortable on reds and not so comfortable on blacks. When Tracy started struggling, I think we'd have had something for him if we'd been on reds, but we struggled to get past Wheldon and Tagliani, so I couldn't catch him anyway.

But you've got to tip your hat to the KV Racing boys: they're doing a hell of a job over there: those cars look very good. Sometimes when you follow a KV car…whoa, it's impressive. Same feeling we all get every time we follow the Penske guys!

Kentucky has been a big confidence-booster for us all. I think we had shown some really strong pace on ovals, but I felt in traffic we weren't quite there. But after this weekend, I feel we're very close now. We could run with those guys up toward the front, and that makes me feel we've got a shot when we go to Chicago to really give everyone a run for their money. The rear feels secure now, and so even if I was directly behind someone, in their dirty air, I felt it was going to understeer, which on an oval is a lot easier to deal with than catching the back of the car!

This weekend, my home race, in Mid-Ohio, I feel we should be very competitive. Unfortunately a lot of teams have tested here and we haven't but I think we should still have a good shot at it. I'm basing that on how we ran in Watkins Glen (where we didn't quite have the speed that the top two or three had, but it felt close) and also taking into account Mid-Ohio last year. We ran well until I made a stupid mistake, but we've made a lot of gains since then. So I think we should be pretty good.

I guess what I'm wanting is a strong qualifying followed by no bad luck on raceday. Just a simple, progressive weekend will see us show what we can do and have the results to back it up. Here's hoping!

Graham

 


 

EXCLUSIVE Column: Graham Rahal - Our first podium of ’09...Now we need momentum

June 30, 2009

Toronto should be good. I raced Champ Car there in 2007 and we had a nightmare, but in Atlantics the year before I was pretty dominant until Matos decided to drive into me! So I’m looking forward to going back, and Edmonton should be good too: that was one of our better road course showings last year. Those two places play to our team’s strengths.

Truth be told, there’s no reason why we shouldn’t finish fifth in the championship this year, best of the non-Penske/non-Ganassi cars, so that’s what I’m focused on right now. We have that potential, but for one reason or another, we’re only ninth at the moment. Breaking into the top four by season’s end would take a bit of luck. Penske and Ganassi are so on top of their games this year, it’s hard to compete, let alone beat them. But these next few races should be Newman/Haas/Lanigan Racing’s best chance of doing that, so we’ll be giving nothing less than 100 percent, believe me.

Before I sign off, one more thing. There’s a bunch of rumors around about the USF1 project and various young American drivers, including me, so just to put you in the picture. Formula 1 is definitely something that interests me, and I’d feel a lot of pride to race there, whether it was with USF1 or any Formula 1 team. But the biggest thing for me is making sure it’s the right opportunity. I don’t want to go to Formula 1 just to be there, just so I can say Graham Rahal, Formula 1 driver!

I’d also want to make sure that F1 has the right atmosphere, because I hear some horror stories about that. My belief is that if you’re not having fun doing what you’re doing, then you shouldn’t be doing it at all, and quite frankly I thoroughly enjoy racing Indy cars. What I’m saying is, I don’t want to go to F1 and be miserable.

The most fun you can have in racing is winning – and right now, I’d like to have more fun…

Speak to you again soon.

Graham
 

EXCLUSIVE Column: Graham Rahal – A great start to the Indy 500 dream

May 10, 2009

photo by Dan R. Boyd/LAT
photo by Dan R. Boyd/LAT

Hello again. I’m writing this on Saturday night and we’ve just qualified the No. 02 McDonald’s car fourth for the world’s biggest race!


The run up to qualifying was not easy, but throughout, I knew that Newman/Haas/Lanigan Racing had given me a quick car. We just didn’t get a chance to show it all the time, but the signs were there if you looked hard enough. For example, on the Thursday before Pole Day, no one outside the team seemed to notice this, but my quickest speed, a 222.996mph which eventually put us ninth quickest, was my first flying lap after coming out of the pits! Unfortunately the No. 02 McDonald’s car then broke a gearbox, otherwise we’d have been much higher up. I reckon we’d have done a 224, maybe even a 225, which would have put us in the top three, but we just never really got to do a run. We only did 40 laps all day but kept having problems.


Then on Friday we were 11th, so again we looked okay but nothing threatening the front row; it felt like we needed to do some more trimming out. I couldn’t put my finger on the problem exactly, but the No. 02 car just felt like it had a little too much drag for the straights. I was also running slightly conservatively, because in the back of my mind I knew that my teammate Robert Doornbos had crashed and he was going to be using the back-up car.


But on Saturday the car felt good – and although Doornbos crashed the back-up car as well, we knew we just had to put that out of our minds for four laps. We did and took sixth with our first run. Now, bearing in mind we had no back up car, people were surprised to see us heading out for another go but what they didn’t know was that we had to. The people in tech were being a bit iffy about a part that we’ve been running everywhere, so that was slightly weird. They hadn’t failed us but it was an issue that needed smoothing out.


Then right before that second run, at about 4.50p.m., the gearbox quit. I don’t know if something got too hot, or what the hell happened, but the damn thing broke! The McDonald’s crew did an amazing job to fit a new one in pitlane, and off we went and got fourth. I’m not just happy for me but for the crew. I mean, how many other teams could have changed the ’box not just in the time available, but so that it worked straight away? Awesome effort all 'round.



Rahal heads for fourth on the grid for only his second Indy 500 start. (Photo by Walt Kuhn/LAT)
Rahal heads for fourth on the grid for only his second Indy 500 start. (Photo by Walt Kuhn/LAT)

Now compare how the Newman/Haas/Lanigan Racing team performed at this track last year, and you start to appreciate the huge progress that we made over the winter. To make that kind of progress, to make that kind of gain on teams like Penske and Ganassi really shows the strength and depth of this outfit. The car feels really secure under me, and of course I feel more comfortable with a year’s experience under my belt.


The signs were there, though, if you look at our performance in Kansas. I know everyone was saying that Kansas has no bearing on Indy because the tracks are so different, but I never agreed. I always thought Kansas was a good indication of things to come at Indy. I mean, just to point out the obvious, last year Scott Dixon was on pole in Kansas and on pole at Indy. If you’re fast on an oval, you’re fast on an oval – plain and simple. People can say what they want, but truthfully the ovals are all going to be the same. If you’re good on any oval, you’re going to be good at Indy. And we’ve just proven that.


I guess I better recap a bit, because my last RACER column was written just before Long Beach race, and obviously that was a frustrating event for us. I wasn’t happy with just seventh on the grid after getting pole at St. Pete, but then what happened in the race with that bad pit stop and then the penalty is doubly frustrating, because we’d gotten ourselves into the top three. It was only a little mistake, but it had big consequences. I feel we have a good shot at this championship, and in order to do that, we can’t make mistakes.


I reckon we had saved as much fuel as anyone else, so without the problem I’d say a top three finish was definitely in the cards for us. I don’t know if we had the pace of Dario, and the way the cards fell with the full-course yellows, he was also pretty lucky that day. But I think we’d have been close. Without doubt, we can be winners on road and street courses this year; we’re at the stage where just a little fine-tuning to improve our race pace will put us right there, every time.



The No. 02's pole position at Kansas was Rahal's first on an oval
The No. 02's pole position at Kansas was Rahal's first on an oval. Photo by Paul Webb/LAT

Kansas had different emotions for me, and in fact they varied over the weekend. In practice, we didn’t get many laps completed which was disappointing so we went into qualifying not really knowing where we were. But when the team told me what my teammate Robert had done on his qualifying run, I was thinking to myself, “Well, if he’s done that, we can go quicker.” That was my mindset. Then the team told me my warm-up lap needed to be faster, so, sure enough, it was hugely fast compared to everybody else’s and then we put four smoking laps on the board: it was great. In a way, that pole meant more to me than St. Pete, because for us to achieve that on an oval was tremendous. The amount of effort it takes for the team to get up to speed on an oval is huge.


In the race, I was struggling with understeer pretty badly, and at first my theory – which seemed pretty logical at the time – was that if I tried the high line, all that would happen would be that I had less room to understeer to. So I didn’t try it… But then when I did, I found the car didn’t understeer at all! So I guess that’s a lesson learned and next time I’ll be more proactive in trying that, for sure. As a result of that, we really picked people off. I had a killer restart going after the final yellow – so good that I thought I could pass three or four cars, but I got chopped on the low line, and ended up losing momentum and a place. But our car’s pace and discovering the high line got us back up to seventh. By then, Marco and Danica were too far ahead to catch before the checker.



Leading teammate Robert Doornbos at Long Beach. (Photo by Dan R. Boyd/LAT)
Leading teammate Robert Doornbos at Long Beach. (Photo by Dan R. Boyd/LAT)

Still I still feel pretty good about our performance in Kansas: we were right up front and we had the pace to be in the Top Three all day. We slipped back, but we made some spots up at the end. There are things we definitely need to improve on, but the pace is there. We just need to smooth some of the rough edges, and I remain as confident as ever that we can.


You want to know if I can win Indy, I’m sure. Well, Newman/Haas/Lanigan Racing is a remarkable team, I always knew that, but even so, the last few months have been a reminder of its sheer depth of talent and the commitment from the very top bosses. That’s why there’s no rest for the McDonald’s crew now: I’m going to be out there testing race setups on Sunday, to try and get a jump on the others.


Is it a good omen that I’ll be starting fourth, considering that’s the same place that my dad started in 1986 when he won the race? Well, I’m not big on omens – but I’d happily be converted on May 24th.

 

EXCLUSIVE Column: Graham Rahal – A Missed Opportunity

April 11, 2009

2009 IRL St PetersburgHey, welcome to my new regular column for RACER.com. Good to be on board, good to have you reading it. I’m assuming you watched the first IndyCar Series round from St. Petersburg last week. Pretty exciting, huh? Pity some of the excitement came at the cost of me, though!

I’ve gotten over it, sure, but it certainly was disappointing to be spun off on the opening lap. It seems like I’m living that cliché – if I didn’t have bad luck, I wouldn’t have any. Having watched all the footage, I’d still say it was Tony Kanaan at fault: he was the one who hit me. But I also think it was partly Dario [Franchitti]’s fault. I don’t think TK should have been trying to shove his nose in there, and he even came and admitted to me that it was his fault. But I think when Dario dived down the inside of my car – well, all the cars, actually! – it startled everybody. It’s an OK move, but for the first lap of the year it seems a bit unnecessary. Debatable, I know.

I say this in all modesty, but it wasn’t a surprise that we got the McDonald’s Newman/Haas/Lanigan Racing No. 02 car on pole position. I had already felt that I had been driving better this year and I felt that the team had really improved since last year. And when we ran on road courses in testing, the car was really good. So logically, I thought pole was possible.

Other people were surprised, that’s for sure, but from my perspective, I knew that we had what it takes to do it. The guys had worked extremely hard in the off season, and right when I got in the car at Sebring for our first test of the year, it was miles better. The overall handling, the consistency of it… It felt like every single aspect was a little bit better which, combined, made the whole package a big improvement. You’d think it might be hard to gauge as we have such a long off-season, but still I could feel it.

The setup that we ran this year at St. Pete was very, very similar to what we had last year. When something’s good, why change it? On raceday, it felt the car went off a little bit quicker than I expected, but overall I was pretty happy. We were damn competitive, no doubt about that, and up until about 10 laps from the end, we had one of the fastest laps of the race. My middle set of tires wasn’t a good set, and the left front wore out too quick, so at the end of that run, I’d lost a lot of track position to Tony and Dario. That was a shame, because after the pit stops we should have been ahead of them, as I’d been saving more fuel than them while going just as quick.

What we take from the weekend is knowledge – knowledge that we have speed. So looking ahead to Long Beach, I really believe we can do the same thing again in qualifying (and hopefully get luckier in the race). Yeah, OK, so the last two years I’ve raced at Long Beach in the Panoz-Cosworth Champ Car, but at least that means I know the track. It won’t matter that this year it’s a Dallara-Honda; I look at all the street and road courses now with the view that we’ve got what it takes. We should be very good, and I think the street courses, as a whole, suit my style better than other ones.

I think a win isn’t just a possibility at Long Beach: I’d go as far as saying that we’re one of the favorites, to carry on Newman/Haas/Lanigan Racing’s great tradition there. Down the years, this team’s had six wins, 14 podiums and 11 pole positions there. And the way we went in St. Pete, I think it’s logical. I’m driving well enough (though I admit there’s still a long way for me to go), the guys are working hard and seeing it pay off, and I’d say now we’re getting to the point where we ought to be contenders every time out. Well, on road and streets, at least; we can’t be sure about ovals yet until we race in Kansas, though I reckon you’ll see improvements there too.

People bring up my age and the responsibility of leading one of the greatest teams in U.S. open-wheel – in fact, that was brought up in my interview in RACER this month! But that’s not extra pressure: I feel that people should be expecting great performances from us. The team is so good, I’ve worked so hard in the off-season – in all honesty, there’s no reason for us to not be good.

As we become strong, this does have a knock-on effect in terms of the demands on my time, but that is absolutely fine with me. There are promotional events that are more fun than others, naturally, but that’s cool with me. If I can help elevate the series and elevate open-wheel racing in North America just by being front and center, I’m happy to do that. I want IndyCars to get the recognition it deserves in the media.

One of the good things I get to do this coming week is for Operation Home Front, a non-profit organization which, to use the wording on their website, “provides emergency assistance and morale to our troops, to the families they leave behind and to wounded warriors when they return home.” So as you can see, it’s one of those causes that’s always worthy and always going to be relevant. They’re giving me a chance to fly from San Diego on a Grumman C-2 Greyhound – it’s a twin turboprop cargo plane – to an aircraft carrier where I’ll stay for 24 hours. Now to give you some idea of how exciting this is for me, I’ve wanted to do this for ages: I love aircraft carriers. I’d be happy to stay on there for a year, never mind a day! I’ll be taking pictures whenever I’m allowed, so make sure you call in at my website!

When I get back to San Diego I’ll head down to Long Beach, go to the gala on Wednesday evening, hook up with the team on Thursday for the track walk and to talk setups, followed by an appearance for IZOD in the evening, and then we get down my real work. Of course, the real work is the real joy in this business: I’m at the classic American street race. No complaints from me! Monday and Tuesday I’ll be doing more promotion work, this time for Honda and my team sponsor McDonald’s.

Like I say if I’m going to be the poster-child for this series, that’s fine by me – bring it on! It means I must be doing something right, and it means the IndyCar Series is promoting us. I’ll get back to you in a couple of weeks and we’ll talk ovals. There are one or two things I need to get off my chest about last year and make sure I remedy this year.

See you in Long Beach!

Graham
 

Rahal penalised after qualifying

July 04, 2001

Graham Rahal, Newman/Haas/Lanigan, Watkins Glen 2009Graham Rahal has been demoted ten places on the Watkins Glen grid after his Newman/Haas/Lanigan car failed a post-qualifying technical inspection for being underweight.

The American had reached the Fast Six session in qualifying and appeared to have secured fifth on the grid, but has now been put back to 15th.

The unhappy Rahal questioned the validity of the penalty and maintained that he had gone into qualifying with a fully legal car.

"It's frustrating," he said. "There is some inconsistency because the car was overweight by five pounds when we went to tech before and now we're underweight and we didn't change anything."

Rahal's penalty means that the two NHLR cars will start 15th and 17th, as his team-mate Robert Doornbos' session had already been spoiled by a suspension problem in part one of qualifying.

The revised grid sees championship leader Dario Franchitti move up to fifth despite his late crash in qualifying, with Mike Conway's new career best becoming sixth rather than seventh. The Dreyer & Reinbold rookie had shrugged off an accident at the start of practice to take a praiseworthy seventh on the grid before Rahal's penalty elevated him onto row three.