13603787 10154259681917410 5634668544688908271 o

13603787 10154259681917410 5634668544688908271 oAcura and RealTime Racing will debut the Acura NSX GT3 on Thursday and Friday during official Pirelli World Challenge testing and practice sessions at Mid-Ohio. The twin-turbo V6-powered supercar has been given permission by PWC to share the track prior to qualifying and gather track data with the rest of the cars in its GT category.

Dutch GT veteran Peter Kox was also announced as the official development driver for the Acura NSX GT3, and after his testing duties are completed on Friday, the NSX development chassis will be displayed in the Mid-Ohio paddock during this weekend's combined PWC and IndyCar event.

“Based on a very successful test program, we’re taking the next logical step in seeing how we stack-up against the competition,” said Art St. Cyr, president of Honda Performance Development. “Mid-Ohio seemed like the perfect opportunity, given the demands it places on a racecar and its proximity to NSX R&D and manufacturing.”

St. Cyr confirmed the car will be shipped to France in September for official FIA homologation testing at the LaDoux circuit, and reaffirmed the plans by Acura and HPD to campaign the car in at least one North American sportscar series in 2017.

"Right now we're still in the stages of determining the who's and the what's of where we're going to run in 2017," St. Cyr told RACER. "All I can confirm right now is that we absolutely are running it in 2017. As far as which series, which teams, and that kind of stuff, we have some finalists but we haven't had final approval, so we're not ready to announce that at this time, but that will be coming fairly shortly."

St. Cyr also said he does not expect to see the NSX GT3 race before the end of the year due to its lack of FIA homologation.

It's believed RealTime Racing will field a PWC GT program for Acura/HPD in 2017, and it's also understood that a list of potential candidates to run the NSX GT3 in the IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship GT Daytona class has been narrowed down to two teams.

little team3NASCAR Sprint Cup racing's current era is dominated by multi-car teams. So why are so many of them getting beaten up by the solo Toyota Camry of Furniture Row Racing and Martin Truex Jr.?

It didn't take long for driver Martin Truex Jr., crew chief Cole Pearn, and the rest of the Furniture Row Racing team to make their bones with new-for-2016 partners Joe Gibbs Racing and Toyota.

After the final Happy Hour practice prior to the season-opening Daytona 500, there was an all-hands competition meeting at the track with David Wilson, president of TRD, U.S.A., his top lieutenant Andy Graves, and the drivers, crew chiefs and assorted personnel from the two NASCAR race teams.

"We had a plan," says Wilson, the brilliant Toyota leader and former U.S. Army Ranger. "When we went out in practice Saturday afternoon, the five Toyotas lined up. We were at the top of the timing and scoring. We realized that our five cars working together could truly do something special on Sunday."

little team4Of course, as Mike Tyson is fond of saying, everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth, and Daytona is a place where a lot of racers get punched, metaphorically speaking.

"Think about how many plans you put in place before the race as momentous as this," says Wilson. "You can't control what you can't control. Most of the time those plans go by the wayside.

"But our teams and our drivers had the discipline and the trust in each other to execute that plan to an absolute 'T.' To come all the way to the white flag, 1-2-3-4-5, and then it was a race."

Ultimately, Denny Hamlin's JGR Toyota crossed the start-finish line 0.010sec ahead of Truex, with JGR's Kyle Busch and Carl Edwards finishing third and fifth, respectively. It was the biggest single race in Toyota's history and it was a seminal moment for Furniture Row: They'd earned their place on the roster, with Truex and the four JGR cars now functioning essentially as one five-car team.

"Cole and Martin full well understood. They had to prove themselves and it was going to take time," says Graves, the group vice president, technical director for TRD. "But in all the meetings we had in Daytona, and then to go win the '500' and have all five of our guys work together the way they did, I think immediately when we left Daytona everyone just said, 'OK, this is pretty powerful. We need to keep it going.'"

little team2Get the complete version of this story in the Legendary Races Issue of RACER, on sale now. Click here to take a video tour of the issue.

To subscribe now at a special discount rate, click here, or to buy the Legendary Races Issue online, click here. To learn where to buy RACER in your area, click here.

RACER is also available digitally for Apple, Android and Kindle Fire devices. RACER Digital has the complete content of the magazine's print edition formatted for mobile viewing. With RACER Digital, you'll have access to your RACER content all the time, wherever you are.
The RACER app can be found by searching for "RACER Magazine" in the Apple, Android or Amazon App stores. The app is free and includes issue previews and the newsfeed. Individual issues can be purchased for $1.99 and an 8-issue annual subscription is $9.99. Back issues are also available.

The FIA may have to force the halo through on safety grounds to get the cockpit protection device on Formula 1 cars in 2017.

The latest Strategy Group meeting takes place in Geneva on Thursday, with the halo's potential introduction one of the main items on the agenda. The indication is the vote will go against the halo unless FIA President Jean Todt can allay concerns the device lacks maturity and is being rushed through, despite passing tests.

Under the regulations its introduction now requires a unanimous vote from the Strategy Group, which is only an advisory body, before being referred onto the F1 Commission, where again unanimity would be required.

Related Stories

{loadposition legends}

Todt and F1 chief executive Bernie Ecclestone possess six votes each in the Strategy Group, while the six teams involved have one vote apiece. It only requires one dissenting voice within the Strategy Group, and again within the F1 Commission where all the teams are represented, for the halo to be shelved.

The FIA could decide to play its trump card in such situations and declare the halo will still be a part of the technical regulations for 2017 on safety grounds.

Ecclestone is believed to be among those in opposition, and that behind the scenes he has been lobbying the teams to vote against it. Ecclestone would appear to have support from Red Bull – prime mover behind the alternative aeroscreen concept – as team principal Christian Horner recently suggested he is not in favour of the halo.

"I'm not a big fan of the halo and the limitations that it has. I certainly wouldn't vote in favour at the moment," he said.

Force India is believed to be another team poised to say no, while McLaren and Williams are also understood to have considerable reservations. Mercedes motorsport boss Toto Wolff admitted recently he has yet to make up his mind.

"Whatever can be done for the safety of the drivers needs to be done, even if it looks disgusting," said Wolff. "I don't think it looks Formula 1, and I don't think it makes the sport, the cars and the drivers appear spectacular. But all that doesn't count because safety comes first. Is it the safety tool we need in order to protect the drivers more?

"My personal opinion is we need to look at all the studies, discuss them and come to a decision that it is either a good thing, or it's a good thing but not where it should be yet, or we don't like it for safety reasons."

Lewis Hamilton, who previously derided the halo as "the worst-looking modification in F1 history," has softened his stance. A FIA presentation for the drivers at last weekend's Hungarian Grand Prix impressed Hamilton, who revealed the halo would improve safety "by 17%."

He added: "It looks terrible, but if one of us is going to have a 17% better chance of surviving in a serious incident..."


Originally on

lat galstad TOR 0716 3419One of the longest serving sponsors in IndyCar racing is on the way out, as Target – which has partnered with Chip Ganassi Racing since 1990 – will exit the series at the end of the season.

Confirmed by the team Wednesday morning, defending series champion Scott Dixon will complete the year in Target's famous red livery before bidding farewell to the department store as his primary sponsor. According to a Ganassi spokesperson, Target will remain with its NASCAR program going forward. The team also said it intends to remain with four Indy cars in 2017 as it searches for a new primary sponsor to replace Target on Dixon's No. 9 Chevy.

"I can't thank Target enough for their partnership on and off the track over the years," Dixon said. "They have been with the IndyCar team for an amazing 27 years, which is unheard of in professional sports, and on the car I've driven for the past 15 seasons. I have nothing but great memories and much thanks for Target being great partners for so long. I'm looking forward to being in the 9 car for years to come and fighting for more wins and championships with Chip and the team."

Team owner Chip Ganassi added: "It's the greatest sponsor in racing, ever. They've been nothing but good to me. They developed me personally and professionally. I've developed lifelong friends and relationships. It is unfortunate they will be leaving the IndyCar Series but rest assured that the No. 9 Chevrolet and the reigning IndyCar Series Champion Scott Dixon will still be in the IndyCar Series next year and beyond, the car will just have different colors on it. We are working through some of those options now.

thumbnail 1990 249 23 Eddie Cheever"Also, we are happy they will remain in the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series with Kyle Larson and the No. 42. I understand things change and people have different marketing efforts. It's one of the longest-running sponsors in racing and they delivered for me and the team, and the team delivered for them."

In a statement, Hulman & Co. CEO Mark Miles thanked Target "for its exceptional commitment to open-wheel racing and to Chip Ganassi Racing for its stewardship of the partnership for the past 27 years."

"The Target brand will always be an integral part of our sport’s history as the number of race victories, championships and Indianapolis 500 wins that occurred in the iconic red livery were unprecedented," the statement continued. "We’re confident that the No. 9 will have new colors to carry in the near future as the team continues its success in the Verizon IndyCar Series.”

The loss of a bedrock brand like Target is expected to have wider implications in the IndyCar paddock. Rumors of Target's departure began in April and have increased in recent weeks to the point where other teams have been forming plans on how to prevent it from spooking their sponsors. 

The longstanding tie between CGR and Target was bolstered by a close relationship between Ganassi and the company's former CEO, but with a change atop Target's management team in 2014, the first cracks in the IndyCar sponsorship program formed that season as Target reduced its commitment from two cars to a single entry for Dixon.

The retail giant entered IndyCar as the primary sponsor for the CGR entry driven by Eddie Cheever (pictured) during the team's formative years in CART and went on to sponsor its open-wheel programs in the Indy Racing League and its modern version, the Verizon IndyCar Series.

Under the Target Chip Ganassi Racing banner, its first championship was earned in 1996 with Jimmy Vasser, and subsequent titles with Alex Zanardi, Juan Montoya, Dixon, and Dario Franchitti were captured in the company's livery. 

Dixon's car has featured the return of Target's popular "bolt" livery this year, and starting this weekend at the Honda Indy 200 in Mid-Ohio, fans will have five races left to enjoy its presence.

phpThumb 1

Welcome to the Robin Miller Mailbag as presented by Honda Racing / HPD. You can follow the Santa Clarita, California-based company at: and on social media at @HondaRacing_HPD and

Your questions for Robin should continue to be sent to We cannot guarantee we’ll publish all your questions and answers, but Robin will reply to you. And if you have a question about the technology side of racing, Robin will pass these on to Marshall Pruett and he will also answer here.

Q: Miller, I am thinking about IndyCar racing and the terrible turnout at the Brickyard 400. Then I read about Tony George becoming Chairman of the Hulman & Co Board. Then I start to read the haters' remarks about the split. After going to races around the country for some 55 years I think we race fans are in trouble.

Let's be honest: tracks are closing and attendance is falling. Many things are being done that are not fan-friendly. Why would you run a major race at 3pm on a Sunday afternoon when history shows that it was close to a full house when it was run on a Saturday, leaving Sunday to return home to go to work on Monday? Why wouldn't NASCAR and IndyCar get together and work out some crossover drivers for the 500 and the Brickyard? That would generate some interest. I wonder if the fans are really necessary - or is it all about the TV money? Someone better get a grip and get some new ideas. What's the story here?

Bob "The old man" Lauman

RM: You nailed the story. Racing attendance is down everywhere because it no longer holds our attention, or because people would much rather watch television (NBBSN had a record five million watch the Brickyard 400) than drive to a race.

Nothing, not the day, starting time, bringing back the apron, switching to the road course or crossover drivers, is going to save the Brickyard. It's a terrible race and always has been, but that NASCAR frenzy from the last decade that carried it has long since faded away. NASCAR takes down seats but still only fills half of them, while a bad NASCAR crowd everywhere would be a huge IndyCar turnout at most places. The Split crippled open-wheel but, as you correctly stated, that's not why attendance has fallen off – it's apathy – because the racing is better than ever. And people aren't going to show up and sit around all day until 3 o'clock for something to happen. There must be constant action, like at a street race.

Q: Surely you have tons of questions following the news of Tony George's position. What does this mean for IndyCar's progression, changes, promotions, and tracks? I understand part of the statement was that nothing will change, or at least significantly, but even that will surely change with time.

Cody Carrete from Hillsboro, OR

RM: Mark Miles' quote in my story indicated TG's transition to chairman of the board has no bearing on management or the game plan of IndyCar. But Tony is blood and the most active of his family in racing, so I don't think it was any big surprise he's now chairman of the board. What might happen down the road is anybody's guess.

Q: I'm sure I know what the reaction of most race fans is to the announcement of TG being named Chairman of the Board. What's the reaction from the racing community?

John Fulton, Akron, Ohio

RM: A huge volume of emails and texts, with a lot of fans fretting, or cussing that Tony is back in charge and a fair number that were happy to hear of his promotion. But I haven't spoken to any drivers or mechanics or owners about it because it only just happened.

Q: How does IMS survive on just one real race per year? In a discussion I had with Parnelli about Ontario when he was in charge there, he said with only a couple races a year and a rock concert or two, they just couldn't pay the bills. I find IMS in the same situation. So what was the real attendance for the Brickyard this year? I realize that the camera coverage is cleverly positioned to not show the empty seats, but I saw more empty seats than occupied. The Xfinity race on Saturday was the worst attendance I have ever seen at any race.

My other observation is market saturation. There are just too many racing series to capture the market. NASCAR remains tops,but even it is suffering. Is it time to put the for sale sign on 16th and Georgetown Road and just have the museum and a gift shop? Why doesn't the raceway hold the aura of what it once was? I attended all the F1 races there, and the MotoGP events for their short stay. There was just no traction to keep it going. I get it, the 100th anniversary race was a huge success, but as a race fan that has spent many, many race days there, it was something else. I found the track full of people just there to party and hadn't a clue who they were even watching.

Grumpy Gary

RM: What if I told you that IMS had $17 million in the bank before it sold one ticket to the Brickyard 400? Between the television money ($15 million) and Crown Royal sponsorship ($2 million), the Speedway turns a profit even with last Sunday's pathetic turnout. Couple that with the monstrous gross last May, and it's been a pretty profitable year. My guess was about 35,000 and that's probably being generous, but there couldn't have been 3,000 people on Saturday.

The NASCAR races at IMS are unwatchable, and another problem is that the Speedway simply has too many events and the luster of the place has worn off. But my old pal Dave Cassidy (TG's real godfather) once told me he figured about 50,000 of the Race Day crowd at Indy were truly fans, and everyone else was there for the party, the experience and the social value.

 lat abbott toronto 0716 4348

Q: Robin, while I love your continued push for Josef Newgarden, c'mon. All this talk about Newgarden and Penske is a pipe dream for now. If indeed Roger wants someone new, all you need to do is look over at Andretti Autosport and Ryan Hunter-Reay. RHR is still very much in his prime, a series champion, Indy 500 winner, a fan favorite, great with media, a sponsor that would probably jump ship with him and a sponsor Roger already has had a relationship with. That is Penske perfect.

Steve, Chico CA

RM: No doubt that's what RP was thinking when he was talking to RHR a few years ago, and he's easily one of the five best in the series. But JoNew is 10 years younger and just as quick – the perfect pick to replace Helio or JPM whenever they're headed for sportscars.

Q: Given how incompetently the Toronto track was built, I think the management needs an overhaul too. There were a lot of things wrong that should never have gotten to the stage they were, when a last-second attempt at a fix had to be hastily found.

As for the future, what if 24 or 26 cars are regularly entered next season? There's no room to accommodate them. The grandstand views are worse than ever, and that's saying something. It's both sad and infuriating that over the 30 years the event has declined as much as it has. By some measures, it may have been a success, but it was also an embarrassment.

Rick in Toronto

RM: I don't think we have to worry about too many cars. The pits are insane right now with 21, so making it wider and safer would be priority number one. Not really sure what the promoters could have done (they moved the wall back in Turn 8 after Friday's practice) because it's just a vanishing track due to construction. But some of those seats by the bridge offered very little in terms of a view. It's sad to see how far the race has fallen from its heyday, but it likely remains one of the six best-attended on the circuit.

Q: Has Toronto turned into a Mickey Mouse track before our eyes? Are there plans for cleaning it up after some of the construction has been completed, or is this the best Toronto has to offer? We just shut off more of our cable access as we start to go more and more online. Problem is, watching the races live via Twitter or a leader board (not a Verizon customer, sorry) has proven to be quite a challenge. I'm old compared to many of the younger generation that have already disconnected. What is the best way to watch for those not at the track and without cable?

John Merli, San Diego

RM: The construction has certainly taken its toll on a once-great street course and I don't see it getting any better but the pits must be fixed by 2017. There are a lot fewer grandstands, and don't forget that the old Molson Indy used to draw 70,000 on race day alone, and I imagine a third of that showed up this year. You don't have to be a Verizon customer to watch the IndyCar app – at least, that's what I was told – and that would be your only outlet without cable.

Q: I was wondering something about the Toronto race. Are we getting squeezed out? Space seems to be getting awfully scarce and tight. Regarding the Houston race, I read somewhere that IndyCar had a contract through 2017, but this is year two of no race. How far away do you think the series is from getting to the ratios of CART 1999? I'd very much be in favor of a 21-race schedule with seven street races, seven ovals and seven road courses. It would be cool if the series would bring back the oval and road course trophies, or maybe do like what they do with the Tour de France – IndyCar could have an overall champion, King of the Streets, King of the Roads, and King of the Rings. I'm really hoping 2017 brings big things.

Kelsey Shoemaker

RM: Thanks to Turns 3-4 (and Juan Pablo Montoya), there was still some decent racing at Toronto, but the last three turns and pit lane need help. Not sure owners can afford 21 races right now – 16 seems like a stretch, and I think you'll only see one race added to the schedule in 2017, but 2018 might see a couple more. And your "king" idea is great, provided you have a financial incentive/sponsor to promote it and make it worthwhile. I recall Sebastien Bourdais winning the Canadian Challenge in Champ Car and his prize was a wooden statue of a Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

Q: IndyCar should be happy it still has attendance. NASCAR is down, and was about half-full at New Hampshire: that's only about 44k, which is a huge drop in the past three years. How many do you think attended Toronto on Sunday?

Mark Fellows

RM: Let's put it into perspective. A crowd of 44,000 on race day would beat anything IndyCar draws except Indy, Long Beach and Road America. I think Toronto was lucky to have 25,000.

Q: Wow, has NASCAR at IMS gone downhill. They used to have more people on Thursday night at Indianapolis Raceway Park! TV money must be paying the bill, because attendance sure isn't. What do you think about Tony being back in charge?

John T. Feeser

RM: Television money is very, very good (see answer above) and it would be smart to move the Xfinity race back to Lucas Oil Raceway ASAP. To quote my good friend Jim Roeder about our former ESPN colleague Marlo Klain: she had more people at her wedding than showed up last Saturday. And TG is not back in charge.


Q: IMS needs to send NASCAR packing. No one is interested in seeing them race. I've seen more fans at Anderson Speedway than showed for the Xfinity race (above). Sprint Cup race was worst at Speedway since F1 tire debacle!

Mike S.

RM: I expect IMS will keep it going as long as those big TV checks keep coming in, but I would think NASCAR might be wondering why it pays all that money for one of its worst and lowest-attended events.

Q: Well, it happened again at Toronto. Minor contact between Montoya and Newgarden results in a rear bumper falling off, causing a caution, and ruining Newgarden's race. It's the third such incident I've documented this year, following nine similar incidents last year where minor, incidental contact makes these flimsy things fall off, causes a caution, and impact the outcome of the race. And when they come off after such minor impacts, they don't keep anybody from wheel-to-wheel contact, so it's not a safety issue. Plus, when the owners continue to squawk about costs being out of control, they sure could save a bunch of money by eliminating them.

I read that Bobby Rahal and Michael Andretti supported their removal, so I was wondering if running without these would be part of the test at Mid-Ohio? Not only would the owners save money, we'd quit screwing up drivers' races with minor contact, we'd eliminate some of the downforce everybody says they want to reduce, and wouldn't it be nice once again to have the cars look more like true open-wheel race cars than they do today?

RM: The good news is that the photo of J.R. Hildebrand's car that ran with RACER's test story from Mid-Ohio did not have all that garbage hanging off it, and looked like a real Indy car. And I think the aero kits will be phased out for good after next season.

Q: I just got back from the IndyCar testing day at Mid-Ohio. Two things that I noticed there: 1) A few guys with Cosworth were there with telemetry equipment set up around the track. Is this a sign that they are interested in bringing their engine program back to IndyCar? I sure hope so! 2) Kanaan and Hildebrand (filling in for Newgarden) were on the track together all day, never more than 30 feet apart from each other. They seemed to be helping each other out. Is there anything to be read into this?

Mark Suska, Lexington, Oh

RM: Jay Frye is hopeful another engine manufacturer can be secured by 2018 and, if so, it's possible Cosworth could partner with them like Ilmor does with Chevrolet. But I don't think it will be a Cosworth, per se. In the meantime, Cosworth is an electronics supplier to IndyCar teams, which is why you see Cosworth guys in pitlane T.K. and J.R. were testing aero options for IndyCar for 2018 so I'm sure they tried running together as much as possible.

Q: There are occasionally comments about not being able to run IndyCars on Circuit X because it would be too expensive to bring them up to current IndyCar safety standards, yet it seems perfectly fine to run on street circuits with configurations that have them running around two-lane-wide curves with concrete walls at the track edge. While I will admit that most permanent circuits may have higher top speeds, some of the street courses of late have been pretty high speed as well. Whatcha think?

Martin Bose

RM: Road Atlanta and Mosport are the two tracks most mentioned as great venues that are too fast for IndyCar because there's not enough runoff area. But, to quote Bob Rahal, how much runoff area is there in Turn 1 at Indy? Maybe IndyCar has to help replace some Armco (although Watkins Glen still has plenty of it) at those two tracks, or chip in for sand traps, but I'd love to see them both on the schedule. And you are correct, the runoff areas at some street circuits are a wall.

Q: At Phoenix in April, there was no passing at all. At Iowa there were passes constantly, despite the fact they had the same aero package, and the speeds were very similar. Why?

1954 Mike

RM: Over to Marshall Pruett:

"The easy answer is the tracks are very different to drive and wear out tires at different rates. Phoenix flows, has one lane, and is easier on tires, while Iowa requires sharper turning, allows drivers to try multiple lines, and places higher loading on the tires for a longer duration. It turned Phoenix into a follow-the-leader race where very few drivers had ill-handling cars, and Iowa had a lot of passing with tires/handling falling off and multiple lanes being utilized."

Q: I'm a regular reader of your column for all the IndyCar news, truth and rumors. I've read twice now that Portand may find its way back on to the schedule. Who do I tell that I'll be there with my family and at least one other family, if it happens? And what do you think the odds are, and when it might reappear? We were regulars in Vancouver and Portland until they shuttered both venues for Indy. Our West Coast options are limited, although we've flown down for the weekend to Sonoma!

A loyal west coast fan,
Dan Schmidt, Vancouver, BC Canada

RM: Nobody to tell just yet, but there are people working hard on trying to get back to Portland by 2018. I'd say if the two promoters I've spoken to can find a good title sponsor or gathers good corporate support and the city gets behind it, it's 70/30 it's going to happen. But nothing to report yet. Thanks for reading.

Q: Has Road America ever announced a final attendance number for the Kohler Grand Prix? Just curious if they broke 100,000 for the weekend.

Jim Scott, Wisconsin Rapids, WI

RM: Not sure I ever saw an official number but I'd day yes to your question – a legit 100,000.


Q: I am curious to know whether you think Simona de Silvestro (ABOVE) will ever get another opportunity in IndyCar? I think she is a better driver than her record shows. Would it be possible for Formula E to run at Indy or other tracks in the states? I am trying to be a fan of Formula E, but find following it rather difficult.

JR Katt

RM: I certainly hope so, because she's the best female road racer ever and certainly capable of winning if she was with one of the powers. She's also a great person who was gaining fans every year with her savvy and spirit. I'm glad some local teams like Andretti are making money with Formula E and I'm glad Dario Franchitti is the analyst on television, but for me, it's just one more series I don't care about.

Q: I've said this before and I'll say it again: The future of IndyCar racing is on natural road courses. If you need any proof of that, look at this season: Road America was a huge success, the anticipation of the series' return at Watkins Glen is palpable, people are begging every weekend for the series to return to Portland and for the series to visit COTA, and races at Circuit Gilles Villeneuve in Quebec and Autodromo Hermanos Rodríguez in Mexico City have been mentioned. What do all of these tracks have in common? They're natural road courses.

IndyCar can't sell tickets at ovals, and for good reason – the racing hasn't been great at ovals outside of Indianapolis since the introduction of the DW12 – and street races are nearly impossible to run sustainably (St. Petersburg, Long Beach, and Toronto are the exceptions. I don't know if Detroit is profitable but for each of them, there's a Boston, Baltimore, Houston, Chicago).

I'm fine with the keeping the current street races and no one should touch the Indy 500, but the oval races at Pocono and Texas are poorly-attended and the racing is even worse. If IndyCar were to drop those two and add Montreal, COTA, Mexico City, and Portland, that, combined with the introduction of a unified aero kit in 2018, would take IndyCar to heights not seen since the CART glory days.

Garrick, Alabama

RM: IndyCar's calling card has always been diversity whether it was mile dirt tracks, ovals or road courses, and IndyCar's heritage is ovals so I don't want to see them disappear. Fontana was as good as it can get in 2015 and Iowa is always entertaining, but Texas has been a dog (on the track and in the grandstands) for several years so dropping it for COTA would be fine. I hope Gateway gets another chance because I think its promoter will give IndyCar a good ride, but Pocono seems doomed because it's caught in the middle of NASCAR.

Q: Come across another ESPN post by a Cup fan saying that IndyCar is boring racing with only one or two drivers winning every race, so I decided to jump into the stats. I only went back to 2012, but it leaves this question. Why in the seventh level of Hell is IndyCar not capitalizing on this? This should be on every front page of every newspaper in America, you know good and well NASCAR would make sure everyone knew this.

2016: IndyCar: 11 races, 7 winners. 63% of all races ran won by a different driver. Cup: 20 races, 11 winner. 55% of all races

2012-2016: IndyCar: 68 races, 37 winners. 54% of all races. Cup: 164 races, 68 winners. 41%

Bill Bledsoe

RM: IndyCar's surefire promotions should be the fastest cars, best racing and most wide-open competition in North American motorsports. Instead, they use a lame catchphrase – Indy Rivals – that means nothing to anyone. But you are correct, NASCAR would bang the drum long and loud about never knowing who was going to win a race because so many drivers have a chance.

Q: How much of Chevy's dominance do you think is due to Chevy package being that much better on road/street courses and short ovals than Honda? I believe that more of the dominance is due to Penske and Ganassi being that much better than the rest with this generation of car. The Chevy package is probably a notch better than Honda, but the difference probably isn't as big as it appears. Another factor that may be hard to quantify is the quality of the Chevy guy compared to a Honda driver based on their records (Chevy has a better crop by a landslide based on wins). Penske and Ganassi drivers have supplied 35 of the 48 available Fast Six competitors this season. Of the remaining 13, Honda has 10.

Proportionately ,however, Chevy does have an advantage since it is about 11 Hondas versus 3 Chevys. When expanded into the top 12 with the road/street/short oval package, the expectations are the same, but Honda again typically has the edge against the remaining Chevy teams with 38-14. As with the previous stat, Chevy does proportionately hold an advantage, but it isn't as dramatic as the Penske and Ganassi dominance.

While it unrealistic to completely remove Penske and Ganassi from the field, Honda has an advantage of 8-4 when comparing the top qualifying position once the two superpowers are removed. (Chevy does better at Phoenix, Alabama, Iowa, and Toronto). Honda does have the two poles at speedways, though it has been pretty bad in qualifying at the short ovals which suggests that the engine isn't the problem. Pocono will probably tell a lot regarding how comparable the speedway packages are.

So while I do believe the Chevy is a better package when using the road/short sval package, the Honda perhaps is not as far behind as the results initially may suggest. Penske and Ganassi really seem to have found the sweet spot with these cars. It also wouldn't be the first time Penske and Ganassi were the stars of their manufacturer (Toyota in 2004/2005).

Justin Lee

RM: There isn't much of a gap between the two, but a couple of tenths a lap over the course of two hours adds up. Honda closed the gap this year and most of its drivers say it's not horsepower they lack, but Chevy seems to have better mechanical and aero grip – hence its domination on road and streets. And for sure, having the two most successful programs on your side with eight cars is a also a nice advantage. But, in terms of pure power, Honda had the fastest straightaway speeds at Indy and Road America.

 JGS 0865

Q: My take on the IndyCar at The Glen: I get that $150-$400 for a campsite that allows two vehicles (or six-to-eight people) for four nights is not a bad rate in itself. But, for me, having to work Thursday and Friday, and not knowing more than one other person who likes racing, this is prohibitive pricing. Add the $90 dollars for the admission, and add 25% currency exchange adjustment because I am Canadian, and now you are looking at almost $750 Canadian for two days' worth of racing. At that rate, I will not be going this year or any year. The Glen needs to also cater to those single or two-person fans that can only go for one night, like me.

Also, I have been enthralled with the Indy Lights series (above) this year. The racing reminds me of the CART days with Bourdais, Tracy, and Tagliani duking it out, but in this series it's Jones, Stoneman and Urrutia, with Veach, Serralles, Kyle Kaiser and Rosenqvist. Prior to Toronto, the top three guys in points were all on probation.

Those are racy cars that Dan Andersen has in this series, and it is every bit as good as IndyCar. They do need more cars, though. Pit stops would also be good, but I get that the extra crew and equipment would make the series too expensive. You never talk about them in any of your articles, or in the Mailbag. Do you watch them at all, and if so, what is your opinion of the racing in this year's series?

Paul Sturmey, Ottawa, Canada

RM: You make a great argument. There should be a race day ticket reasonably priced (say $40 that includes paddock access). IndyCar and The Glen are trying to grow an audience, and it's done by giving people a bargain the first couple years to get them in. The Lights series is very entertaining with some damn good, young racers and I should do more with it – period.

Q: Update to The Glen camping prices. Mid-Ohio is charging $60 to stay the weekend in a tent and $125 to stay the weekend in a motorhome. Draw your own conclusions.

Paul Winter, Eden NY

RM: But you still need a general admission or grandstand ticket, and they range from $75-$85 for all three days to $55 on race day only. Still pretty reasonable though, and a three-day paddock pass for $30 is one of the best bargains going.

Q: While there will always be a danger to pit members regardless of cars pitting under yellow or green, there is an inherently greater risk when there are more cars on pit road at one time. That occurs during yellows. Most of the accidents on pit lane do not occur between cars pitting next to each other. They occur because the pit lane is too crowded.

Take the Coyne accident at the 2015 Indianapolis 500. Pippa Mann left her pit stall and drove in the left pit lane because there was a car on her right in the outside lane. She could not slide over. Then Davison left his pit box and drove into Pippa, causing him to spin into Vautier's crew. In 2016, Townsend Bell couldn't move all the way to the outside lane because Helio was there, so he makes contact with RHR. Fortunately no crew members were injured.

Contact is inevitable, but I think it would be a lot less likely if 33 cars (or 24 or so on non-500 races) are not all on pit lane at the same time. Obviously there is a reason pack racing is so dangerous, so why encourage a pack of cars all on pit lane at one time? By only allowing green flag stops, you increase the chances that fewer cars will pit together. Even if it is spread out over three laps, that makes for a very less crowded (and safer) pit lane. By continuing to close pit lane when the caution comes out, you still keep drivers from racing to pit lane right when the yellow comes out. If you must come in to receive fuel in order to not run out, you'll end up at the back of the line, so that would be a big reason for teams not to run fuel all the way down during the early portions of the race.

This would essentially work the same as the current rule, except teams would need to plan their pit stops with this rule in mind. In essence, teams would have to balance the risk of running all the way down compared to stopping a few laps early in case a caution comes out soon after. It would also eliminate the "wave around" rule. For example, if you pit under green and lose a lap, you are hurt when other drivers get to make their stop under yellow. But, if pits were closed, you would be able to un-lap yourself when the leaders make their pit stops under green.

TV could also have more time for commercials during yellow since they would not show the pit stops, so hopefully there would be less commercials during green flag racing. Obviously there is not a perfect solution, or it would be in place right now.

Sasha K.

RM: Tight pit boxes and cars wide open on pit speed limiters leaving the box are just as culpable. I favor the sportscar rule of not letting crew members over the wall until the car stops, but they're still in harm's way on pit exits. It's amazing, I worked for Lloyd Ruby when there was no pit speed limit and he came in at 170mph at Indy, Pocono and MIS, but nobody ever got hit. And we had to push the car out after the stop, so there was no frenetic fishtailing out of the boxes.


Q: With the news that Fernando Alonso is open to being "lured away" by Le Mans or the Indy 500, now surely has to be the time for IndyCar or one of the big teams to start throwing everything in Fernando's direction. Can Andretti or Rahal (or any Honda team) use the Honda link and get him to test an IndyCar next season? It might not lead to a '90s style boom period, but It would be a huge coup to get a global star like Alonso over to the series, even if it's just the Indy 500 at first. Surely worth breaking the bank over?

Andrew B., Nottingham, England

RM: Although his star is fading under the weight of McLaren's free-fall to the bottom, Alonso is still a big name and might sell some tickets next May so I imagine a team could find a sponsor. That said, he's not Nigel Mansell-big – coming off a world title – so I wouldn't break the bank, but it might be a nice tie-in for Honda and good PR for IndyCar that he's publicly declared he wants to win Indy.

Q: I always respected Fernando Alonso's talent but I really enjoyed his comment about how he said the Indy 500 and the 24 Hours of Le Mans are the two races with the most prestige and that he has interest in running the 500. After seeing the emotions of guys like Munoz, TK and RHR at this year's 500, and how much it means, it's still a victory that drivers all over the world want. I was glad to see a driver like Alonso make that comment because it seems like here in America, the media and many race fans seem to act like Daytona is the only race that matters. Of all the drivers you know from other series which has shown the most praise for the 500 and wants to win it more then anyone?

Ryan McKeever

RM: First off all, I imagine Alonso would relish the chance to actually have a fighting chance again in a racecar, so that's part of Indy's appeal. But I don't think Daytona is viewed larger on an international scale, and most drivers from other disciplines would likely favor Indy on their bucket list. Kyle Busch has made it clear he wants to run Indy (ditto for Kyle Larson and Rico Abreu), and said a few years ago he couldn't do it until he won a title for Joe Gibbs. Well now he has, and that guy is a racer that seems to embrace challenge.

Q: I'm not sure if this has been brought up yet, but after seeing Will Power finally win the luck of the draw on yellows at Toronto, I am in a confident enough mood to propose an idea. IndyCar needs restarts and yellow flag bunch-ups. It has added excitement throughout the entire history of the series, and it prevents a F1 Mercedes-esque runaway day that the fans will sleep through. That being said, I grow slightly tired of seeing a team's day getting ruined due to a gamble on yellows.

Here's my plan: what if a VSC came on for just the first caution lap? Slow the cars up when the yellow comes out, but let the teams pit. Then, after the first lap of yellow, the pace car comes out and allows for a green flag restart. Would this work? I think it may prevent a race-ruin for cars pitting that get caught by yellows, and also would keep drivers from racing to the pits on yellows. What do you think?

Grant Vague, Minnesota

RM: Brian Barnhart's response:

"I like the concepts, where the field is slowed safely by either a VSC or electronically, and then the pace car comes out to pack them up and leads to a restart. If we can work on the system to get them slowed down on the first lap, it has some merit for sure."

Q: Once again a brilliant performance is destroyed by the yellow flag lottery. I can't believe that the people in charge of IndyCar find this acceptable. I don't want to hear that the pits have to be closed because they don't want anyone driving unsafely to get to the pits. Recently they punished a driver during qualifying for not slowing down for a local yellow, so they know how to use the telemetry. Once there is a full-course caution they could use the Virtual Safety Car to get all the cars slowed down with the pits open. Then the pace car could pick up the first car out of the pits, or the first car that chooses not to pit after the start / finish line, and then let the field bunch up prior to the restart.

It seems to me that sometimes, instead of looking at new technology and seeing how it might work to make the racing better, IndyCar management would rather ignore it. If they are still worried about drivers speeding to the pits, then make the penalty severe enough that no one would try. I don't have a favorite driver or team, I just want to see good, fair racing. I do think that if a driver is having a day where he can pull a four- or five-second lead over the field, it shouldn't come down to the luck of the draw with a full course caution and end up eighth, while a driver who would probably not be in the top ten ends up on the podium.

Dave, Vineland, NJ

RM: As it was stated a couple Mailbags ago, the competitors complained about open pits to IndyCar a couple years ago so it was decided to close them. It can be unfair, and there is also a rule of thumb than when your pit window opens and you're leading, get in before a caution waves and catches you out. Waiting cost Castroneves a win at Detroit and Dixon a win at Toronto.

Q: Toronto once again illustrates how awful full course yellows can be. I really dislike full-course yellows being used on anything but ovals in the first place, but if they have to be used, why not form up the cars behind the safety car in the order they were in on the lap preceding the incident which caused the caution? Leave the pits open, and if someone chooses to stop and go to the back of the field, so be it. I road raced for 20 years and never experienced more than local yellows, and maybe a couple red flags for more serious situations.

Lyle Rundhaug

RM: I'm told that IndyCar is reviewing its procedures and looking at finding some kind of remedy to rectify the FCY curse, but it's a work in progress. How's that for not answering your question?

 Vogie in 1973

Q: I cannot believe its been 26 years since the passing of the great Rich Vogler! A couple of my memories were at Winchester when his dad Don was starting last in a heat race, and when they threw the green, Don was leading them across the line. This happened three times before they black-flagged him, and here came Rich charging toward the flag man standing on the pit wall and showing the flag man his middle finger. The fans loved it!

Another time in the infield at Salem, he was sitting with family and I went and asked him if me and some friends could get a picture with him, he said sure! Before we took the picture he wanted to know all of our names and where we were from, and that was cool since most drivers act like they're doing you a favor and don't give a crap who you are. Loved watching him run the hills of Salem and Winchester; nobody was better, he raced against the track, constantly pushing his own limits, because when he was in good equipment no one could run with him. I miss Rich and will always remember him.


RM: There was a lot of tough love in the Vogler family and I think it played a big role in Rich being such a bulldog on the track. He was relentless in a midget or sprint car, and nobody ever drove any harder. He was oblivious that other drivers might not like him, he didn't care, but beneath that Mad Dog exterior was a pretty nice guy. Even if he was kicking ass (like that night in Salem), he just couldn't slow down or back off, and sadly, that's what ended up killing him. But what a racer.

Q: With all the aerokit/OEM discussions for 2018, any talk of the return of standing starts for road/street courses?

John Plachta

RM: Haven't heard it mentioned, but they should be mandatory at Long Beach and Toronto.

Q: So, most guys will tune in Family Feud to see the swimsuit models but who knows, if the IndyCar guys put on a good show maybe they will get a few new fans. I have not seen that show since way before Richard Dawson left, but I think I might watch this one. I just hope like hell the guys win.

Tom in Waco

RM: You're referring to the Celebrity Family Feud with Will Power, Conor Daly, James Hinchcliffe, Helio Castroneves and Tony Kanaan competing against swimsuit models. It's going to be on this Sunday evening on ABC following the Mid-Ohio race on CNBC and re-air on NBCSN.

Q: A question that has not been discussed in full. Due to the rash amounts of concussions coming to the fore lately, have the helmet designers overlooked something? Were the drivers of old tougher, or did they just drive through the problem? Dario and Dale Jr. don't give up easily, so their problems must have been tough.

Don Betsworth, Torrance, CA

RM: Interesting question. I have lunch every week with Pancho Carter, Lee Kunzman, Bill Vukovich, Bubby Jones, Merle Bettenhausen and Gary Irvin, and we were trying add up all our concussions the other day. We surmised that nobody knew much about concussions, or paid much attention, back in the '60s and '70s, and they weren't given a second thought. Think about all the guys who got KO'd in an Indy car but were back behind the wheel in a back-up car after a night's sleep. Not sure it was bravado as much as it was the urgency not to miss a race.

Today's helmet makers and car manufacturers have made amazing advances, and a driver is safer than ever before. But a vicious hit like Dario took at Houston, compiled with his other high-speed licks, put out the stop sign and although he didn't want to quit he made a wise decision. And I guess in Earnhardt's case it doesn't have to be a big hit for him to be concussed. But times have certainly changed.

197112032 7170Q: There's something worse than hate, and that's indifference. For years, IndyCar racing was appointment TV for me. I never missed a race. After years of abuse, now it's fine if I catch it, and fine if I don't. It pains me to say that, as it comes from someone who loves IndyCar, was raised on it, and wants it to be successful! I never miss a week of the Mailbag – it's more enjoyable than a race.

If the sport proceeds with something like an aeroscreen, that'll be the straw that breaks the camels back, bringing to an end my lifetime love affair with IndyCar. IndyCar's DNA is open-wheel, open-cockpit racing, But with the combination of snowplow front wings and enclosed rear-wheel pods, IndyCar has already taken a huge step away from being open wheel. Just look at pictures of a 2011 vs. 2016 IndyCar. That's a huge step away from proper open-wheel. And, as an aside, the last beautiful IndyCar (not including CART/ChampCar) was 1996.

Don't get me wrong: I'm pro-safety. Advancements like the HANS and the SAFER barrier are game-changers. But they don't alter the fundamental DNA of open-wheel/open-cockpit racing. Things like the aeroscreen are antithetical to the ethos of open-cockpit racing; an ethos that all drivers are aware of as they choose to climb the open-cockpit ladder.

An aeroscreen puts a windshield on an open-cockpit racecar. Sacre bleu! And while the aeroscreen will add a degree of safety, it won't prevent Justin Wilson/Henry Surtees-like tragedies, where debris rained-down from above. So at some point, with the best of intentions, someone will inevitably say, "Hey, for safety, why stop at an aeroscreen – let's add a roof!".

When drivers choose to go open-wheel/open-cockpit racing, they know going in the cars have open wheels and open cockpits. It'll be a sad day if open-wheel/open-cockpit racing is ending, but I'll move on to sportscars like the WEC. They have better looking, higher performing race cars. And they do a better job with that style of racing. No question for you, Robin. Just a deeply disappointed rant.

Mike in San Francisco

RM: You feel the same way I do, because open wheel and open cockpit carries a certain edge that separates it from anything else. I was talking to Dan Gurney about it the other day and he shares our concern that IndyCar can't lose all its identity and become a glorified sportscar. And ex-world champ and Indy winner Jacques Villenueve summed up my feelings when he responded to F1 drivers calling for halo protection:

"If they are afraid, they should go and race touring cars," said Villeneuve. "Yes, we must strive for safety, but there are limits we should not exceed. Risk-taking is inherent in F1. It's part of the beauty of the sport. For me, the halo is too much. I see it that these drivers earn millions and yet they do not want to take any chances. Too bad. Do the MotoGP riders ask to ride inside a bubble? This is why they are increasingly respected and admired compared to F1 drivers."

Q: Now that we have fulfilled all of the historical requirements considering tradition and history at the Indy 500 for the 100th time, can we now offer for consideration a Garage 34 position where a published set of rules are in place but car builders are free to use certain types of power and fuel as long as it has four wheels and a safety cell? You want qualifying to be interesting? How about three or four innovative cars, just like every year at Indy in the 1960's? There's a lot of potential in this. As far as tradition, we have already broken them all with NASCAR, Formula 1 and now a road race on the infield of Indy during the month of May!

Kent Taylor, Destin, FL

RM: I think it's going to take this kind of thinking to get more companies involved, more manufacturers competing and more people paying attention. But it's also going to take a major enticement ($10 million to win) to create that kind of interest, and we can't have cars going 60mph slower on the track during the Indy 500, so it needs some serious thought.

Q: As a longtime IndyCar fan, I believe that its time for the series owners and officials to think outside the box more than ever. The series needs to do something to set itself apart and be interesting and new. First, as many of the young open-wheel drivers follow their dreams and the money trail to NASCAR, IndyCar needs to align itself with the sportscar world and IMSA. What better place to develop young talent and allow them to learn to race than to come up through many divisions they offer. It's a ready-made feeder and development system that is probably also cheaper to purchase a car to race and be competitive within the rules. Cheaper than purchasing and operating Pro Mazda and Indy Lights cars and teams, for sure. It could also allow them to develop young drivers regionally much like NASCARS K&N series.

With this comes a fundamental change to what we think of as an IndyCar. I fully understand the need to keep cost down, but to continue to offer a spec product with single suppliers with little to no noticeable innovation is a bad idea. Taking into account the similar look to an F1 car, with the same style feeder system, the comparisons are going to be there and be unfavorable to IndyCar, especially considering they are often both televised and promoted on NBCSN.

To me, an IndyCar is the car used by the series that runs the Indy 500. A new, innovative style of car that sets itself apart, as well as going to tracks both new and legendary that the fans want to see is the way to bring this once-premier series back and to make it stand out. When I envision a new IndyCar, I see a mini, center single-seat version of an open-cockpit prototype car, powered by production spec V6 or V8 engines. Get rid of the engine supplier rules, and allow a manufacturer to supply engines to as few or as many as teams as they want. This may even lead to a couple of factory teams. Chassis could come from Riley, ORECA and even Dallara. Pairing with IMSA, re-imagining the IndyCar and changing the engine specs and the supplier rules could make the manufacturers sit up and take notice.

The stagnation of IndyCar has left me wanting for a while now, and I get my racing fix from F1, IMSA, WEC, and others. I still watch IndyCar, but it has to find a way to set itself apart. The return to the legendary road courses has got me buzzing a little bit, but the lack of any real innovation over the last few years has gotten old. And I don't count the new aero kits. It's time for a new IndyCar from top to bottom. It doesn't have to be Grandpa's IndyCar any more. Sorry for venting; the series used to be a spectacle, but with all the great racing available now, it's becoming an also-ran. I don't want it to disappear altogether.

Rory King

RM: Not sure sportscar racing is any cheaper than the Mazda Road to Indy, and I don't see how it's better preparation to be an IndyCar driver. I think Dan Andersen's path is fine, and he can help Spencer Pigot get into an IndyCar – but staying there requires big money that's tough for anyone to obtain. You are spot-on about aero kits. IndyCar is going to have some kind of new look by 2018, and hopefully that also includes a third engine company. But to get innovation like you suggest is going to take much larger purses and more of an open shop to attract any new interest, and I don't see it happening.

16C 7152 1Robin Frijns gave his Andretti Autosport team plenty to think about after spending a half-day in Ryan Hunter-Reay's No. 28 Honda Indy car at Mid-Ohio. The Dutchman, 24, had never seen the track or turned a lap in a Dallara DW12, yet came within 0.18 seconds of matching the best time set by RHR during the cooler morning test session.

Andretti's FIA Formula E driver, who rose up the European open-wheel ranks and reached Formula 1 as a test driver with Caterham in 2014, made a compelling case for future consideration within Andretti's IndyCar operation.

frijns"I enjoyed it a lot; it was the first car with downforce I've driven in a few years since Formula 1, and I only drove that car three times with it," Frijns (pictured) told RACER. "I always told myself I enjoy downforce cars more, so I'm thankful to Michael for the opportunity.

"It was my first time seeing the track and driving the car, and Ryan did the first 10 laps with new tires and did a good lap time. Then I jumped in and was straight on the pace. The second and third outings were good with the tires I had on, so we put a new set on and I almost matched Ryan's time. He's a very good driver, so it was a good benchmark to have."

The combination of high temperatures and the heavy physical expenditure that comes from driving an Indy car at Mid-Ohio took its toll on Frijns, although as he tells it, the lack of driving aids and power steering wasn't a bad thing.

"It was a bit physical for me because it has been a while since I drove a downforce car," he said. "Like anyone, your body has to get used to it for one day and the second day would be fine – but I only had one day. It was a new experience; I was used to all the buttons and stuff [in F1], but here, the driver has to do everything himself in the car, which is a bit more of my style.

"The engine has good sound, which is different from Formula 1 today. I liked it a lot. I had a lot of fun with the team and they are very passionate about racing. I was very comfortable with the team and the car."

Frijns is coming off a solid debut season with the Amlin Andretti Formula E program (below) and has signed to return next season. It leaves guest appearances as the only option for the immediate future and, given the chance, he'd welcome racing for his team owner in multiple series.

"I signed to do a Formula E season with Andretti again next year, so that's the first goal to fight for the championship and win races, and if an IndyCar race comes along, that would be a bonus," he added. "It's not my decision, but I would love to race one day in IndyCar. Let's wait and see what Michael's going to do."


World champions Fernando Alonso and Jenson Button are hoping Formula 1's new technical direction for 2017 will address their unhappiness with its current state.

Both McLaren-Honda drivers have criticized F1 recently, with Alonso attacking the conservative style of racing and reiterating his belief that the current cars are too slow reiterating his belief that the current cars are too slow, while Button suggested "this sport has a long way to go before it's good again" after getting penalized for a radio rules infringement in the Hungarian Grand Prix.

Related Stories

{loadposition legends}

Next season F1 will adopt new technical regulations that are designed to free up engine development and produce faster cars, featuring better tyres and enhanced aerodynamics. Alonso has already suggested he may leave F1 if next year's cars do not address his concerns, and he is expecting a significant improvement.

"I think next year the cars will be a bit more challenging, a bit more exciting," he said. "The speed on the corners should go back to what we used to feel in the past – what Formula 1 should be.

"I think Friday in GP2 [in Hungary], in the first session, it was two or three seconds off the pace of Formula 1 in free practice one and that's unacceptable. The cars now are too slow. So next year we will go back to our normal Formula 1."

Teammate Button's future remains in doubt, as his McLaren contract is due to expire at the end of 2016, but he thinks every F1 driver will excited by the prospect of new, faster cars for next season.

"We've both been around a few years and remember the days of V10s and tire wars and massive amount of downforce," he said. "We've experienced so many different types of Formula 1 and the last few haven't been the best in terms of the regulation changes.

"Formula 1 as a whole understands that, and that's why we have these big changes for the future. We're not in the right place. I think next year is a good step forward.

"You could say it's brave because it's a lot of changes – mechanical grip, aerodynamic grip – but I think it's fantastic that Formula 1 is on this path. It will be more like we're used to. We'll get out of the cars with a bigger grin on our faces and I think the sport will grow because of that."

Button also reckons the racing spectacle will not be unduly affected by large increases in aerodynamic performance.

"I don't think overtaking is going to be more of an issue," he added. "Because of the type of aerodynamics we have on the cars next year it shouldn't be affecting the front wings as much as people might expect."


Originally on

TVil2Spin the camera in any direction as you ride with Toni Vilander inside the Risi Competizione Ferrari 488 racecar during practice for IMSA's WeatherTech SportsCar Championship event at Lime Rock Park.


Follow Racer

Subscribe to Racer

The RACER Poll

Which of the top five drivers in points will win the IndyCar Series title? Or will it be someone else?
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
  • Votes: (0%)
Total Votes:
First Vote:
Last Vote:

Video: The Legendary Races Issue

The Great Legendary Races Issue is on sale now. Click here for more information.

Race Cars For Sale


Great Race Day 9 with Andy Bell.

See more than 50 On Board videos.

Honda Racing / HPD Videos

Battle of the Brickyard featured quarter-midget racers from around the country competing at the legendary Indianapolis Motor Speedway.